Daily decisionSunday, 27 September 2026

Expeditions

A Change of Destination 1909–1910

You are advising Norwegian polar explorer Roald Amundsen.

Amundsen has raised money and borrowed the polar ship Fram, used on earlier Norwegian expeditions, for an expedition to drift across the Arctic Ocean towards the North Pole. News now arrives that two Americans, Frederick Cook and Robert Peary, both claim to have reached the North Pole.

Known information

  • Sponsors, the Norwegian public and the ship’s owners expect an Arctic expedition.
  • A British expedition led by Robert Falcon Scott is preparing to try for the South Pole.
  • Fram’s planned route to the Arctic already takes it south around Cape Horn.
  • Announcing a change of goal could bring objections that stop or delay the voyage; keeping it quiet could damage trust.
What do you recommend?

Choose before you look it up. You will see what happened straight after.

Reveal the final split and what happened (decide first)

Final worldwide split, 27 September 2026

Redirect to the South Pole History 66%
Keep to the Arctic plan 34%

689 players worldwide

Fact

What actually happened

Amundsen secretly redirected the expedition to the South Pole. (Redirect to the South Pole)

Amundsen told only a few people. The crew learned of the new destination at Funchal, Madeira, in early September 1910, and a telegram informing Scott reached him in Melbourne in October. Amundsen and four companions reached the South Pole on 14 December 1911, about five weeks before Scott’s party, whose five members all died on the return journey.


Important

Possible consequences · Analysis and speculation, not fact

An Arctic drift might have produced valuable science but little public recognition after the Cook and Peary claims, possibly limiting Amundsen’s later expeditions. This is an assessment, not a known outcome.

History does not reveal what would definitely have happened under the other choice. Many factors could have changed the outcome.

Context · Why it was decided this way

Amundsen’s supporters argued that the North Pole claims had removed the public interest and funding for his Arctic plan, and he intended to go north later. Critics, especially in Britain, saw the secrecy as unsporting.

Historians often point to Amundsen’s use of skis and sled dogs, and his careful preparation, as major reasons for his success, alongside the differences in route and weather between the two expeditions.

Sources

  1. The third Fram expedition (1910–1914) · The Fram Museum
  2. North Pole to South Pole · Roald Amundsen’s House (Mia museums)
  3. The expeditions of Roald Amundsen · Antarctic Heritage Trust

Spotted an error? Tell us.